Business Chaser


Cranford

Township committee

Two will serve three-year terms.

Patrick Giblin (D) — 4,157

Jean-Albert Maisonneuve (D) — 3,728

Andis Kalnins (R) — 3,452

Richard Buontempo (R) — 3,435

Board of education

Three will serve three-year terms. 

Rita Della Valle — 2,491

Lisa A. Carbone — 3,634

Kristen Mallon — 2,737

Kurt T. Petschow, Jr. — 2,995

One will serve a one-year unexpired term. 

Daniel DeMarco — 3,204

http://www.nj.com/union/index.ssf/2017/11/nj_general_elections_2017_union_county.html#incart_river_index

 

The Dem death grip on the Union County Freeholders continues, as it does with Sheriff.

And the winner of the Governor’s race is Jon Corzine’s Legacy.

 

 

 

Advertisements

I am mystified as to how Moran stays employed. Well, not that mystified, it is the Star Ledger that employs him and I wouldn’t call them the “smart money”. Here’s his 5 Reasons to Vote for Murphy. And it contains a whole lot of stupid.

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/11/five_reasons_why_murphy_deserves_new_jerseys_vote.html

Let’s look at the top five reasons voters ought to get out and pull the lever for Murphy.

1. Start with President Trump. In the final stretch of the 2016 campaign, Guadagno recorded a mass-distribution phone call urging voters to support Trump, and she is now spreading the same kind of bile on immigration. As governor, we could expect her to make common cause with him on big issues like taxes and health care. No, thanks.

Republicans in Congress are watching this race, one of just two off-year elections in the country. A sharp rejection of Guadagno, with a heavy turnout, would make it crystal clear that their alliance with Trump puts their careers at risk. In this dangerous moment of our history, that alone is a compelling reason not just to vote, but to rent a bus, and drive all your friends to the polls as well.

So, a participating in a robocall supporting the national party nominee is enough to damn Guadagno. Okay.  But I doubt Republican Congressmen are paying much mind to a non-congressional race in a hopelessly corrupt state where Republican emigration has been occurring for years. Someone also needs to remind Tom that gerrymandering is a thing and most congress members will get reelected.

2. Remember the Christie baggage. Guadagno has been 100 percent loyal to Gov. Chris Christie, even his cuts to Planned Parenthood and his veto of sensible gun-control bills.

Lieutenant, Schmeutenant, she should have gone rogue and rebelled. That would have been rewarded. Granted, Christie has been a disappointment. To me mostly because of how little he did. He talked a lot, but little has changed. Plus NJ gun laws are insane. Cross a bridge from PA doing something completely legal and poof, you’re in deep. Just ask Josh Huff.

Read this paragraph twice and tell me where it’s logical. I’ll wait:

3. Murphy is better on property taxes. Yes, Guadagno based her campaign on this issue until her recent lurch towards Trump. But her convoluted plan to pay a portion of property taxes for middle-class families is a fake. At a cost $1.5 billion, it is the most expensive promise made by either candidate during this fiscal crisis, and Guadagno offers no credible way to cover the costs. Wasn’t Murphy supposed to be the reckless one?

Murphy offers tangible help. He wants to increase aid to public schools after years of frozen funding, a boost he would finance with a modest increase on incomes over $1 million. School costs account for the biggest chunk of property tax bills, by far, so boosting state aid should help contain future increases.

You see, increasing aid to public schools fixes property taxes! By increasing state taxes! On the evil corporations and rich people who have the means and ability to flee the state! This is the opposite way to fix the problem, which is reducing costs and waste if you didn’t realize that already. A side question, which schools would get even more aid? Think Cranford will get anything significant? Ha.

Here’s the next one:

4. Corporate tax loopholes. Murphy would stop the outrageous giveaways to big corporations. That starts by closing a tax loophole, known as combined reporting, that allows New Jersey companies to shift profits to paper entities in lower-tax states, costing the treasury about $300 million a year.

Why does NJ need corporate tax subsidies? Because the normal tax structure is not competitive and companies will leave. Eliminating subsidies will increase the incentive to bail from the state. Subsidies with jobs in the state is better than no jobs in the state because everybody left.

I have said previously, I am not enamored by any candidate, but does this sound like a convincing case?

So, blah blah blah on marijuana… and here’s the big close:

There is more. Murphy would rejoin the regional pact to fight climate change by reducing emissions from power plants. He’d also stop pilfering funds dedicated to restoring toxic sites and green energy.

He has a more ambitious list of liberal goals, like free community college, subsidies for day-care, and tax breaks for the working poor. But he admits all that is contingent on a burst of economic growth, a tacit admission that we can’t afford it all unless circumstances change.

Yes, he has deep flaws, he’ll have to learn the job on the fly, and he may even be a complete flop. His alliance with public worker unions is toxic. It helps explains his backward attitude on charter schools in poor cities, his resistance to the cuts in platinum health benefits for public workers, especially for teachers, and his refusal, at least for now, to embrace the 2 percent cap on salary boosts for cops and firefighters.

With Murphy we’ll have more expensive electricity, or we’ll have to get it from PA, as power plants would likely scale back or close. But we’ll still be good with the grid and that big uptick in economic growth!

And even with a huuuuuuuge public pension gap we’ll still get free community college and more government handouts.  Where will that money come from? Where will the economic growth come from? The Amazon warehouses by the turnpike?

Here is the best sentence of the whole piece: “His alliance with public worker unions is toxic.” This was a trait that Corzine had that baffled me. He loved (literally, it turned out) the public sector unions. He didn’t need their money or was beholden to them to get elected. And he was so awful that a Republican beat him after only one term. In the private sector, a union unchecked can either drive their employer to bankruptcy or make them retreat to a friendlier business environment. With a public sector union, we are the employer. They will push until we are bankrupt or we leave for a friendlier environment.

So after Murphy’s carpetbombing of the Star Ledger with advertisements for over a year, I guess Moran felt indebted to write something nice.

We’re in for a long four years.

I’m rooting for gridlock.

 

Unfortunately I could not attend the Community Center meeting last night. From the sounds of things I would not have gotten in anyway.

https://www.tapinto.net/towns/cranford/articles/cranford-residents-organize-to-resist-750-walnut

For non-Cranford readers, a large parcel near the southern border of town was an office / warehouse park that is owned by Hartz Mountain, the flea collar people. The anchor tenant recently left / was kicked out and they want to rezone for over 900 rental units.

http://www.goleader.com/news/docs/2017-06-05-CF-Hartz/Hartz_Site_Plans.pdf

This did not sit well with thousands of Cranford residents.

Understandably. That’s a lot of units.

Being a southsider, I drive on Walnut Avenue daily. I have an incentive to have traffic be metered or  be not much worse that it is today. It does get busy several times per day already. (An aside: I have long been in favor of a weight-sensitive light with left turn signals on Walnut northbound for those turning left on Chester Lang, but more for cars wanting to turn from Chester Lang to Walnut Ave northbound. They can sit there waiting for quite a while and with these units that wait will be longer.)

With people leaving for work, coming home and driving to stores and activities, this would add thousands of vehicle trips on Walnut per day. You think the backlog at Lincoln is bad now….

Plus I agree that a large residential development (which would add about 10% more households to the town) is likely to stress the schools (I could go on a rant on how the schools probably could do more with less, but that would be every rant ever). It would heavily affect Walnut Ave, Livingston Ave, and Hillside Ave schools since all of those students would be assigned to those schools. Or they’d need to be bused to the northside schools. THAT would go over with the northsiders…

Yes, the development would be paying taxes, but the schools may be at a point of capacity where they cannot accommodate the number of children physically in the space with the additional influx. With capital projects being ludicrously expensive due to inefficiency, paying union prevailing wages, and overruns, any increase in school tax revenue would be heavily offset by the increased costs. Most likely resulting in more bond debt.

Hartz is entitled to see what they can do with the property that would create the most value and generate the most cash. Unfortunately the NJ economy limits the potential uses due to obscene tax rates and regulation. Also, retailing has overcapacity, office space has overcapacity, and residents would be fighting even harder against any heavy or potentially polluting industry so close to homes.

So that leaves residential, nursing homes, and not much else, (I don’t think a hospital could work with one in Rahway so close).

Another issue with residential is that it is very tough for the land use to change once it is residential. Rental units would require eviction and some legal battles before buildings could be razed. A very hard bell to unring. Business buildings are much easier to change and reconfigure (kicking out 5 tenants is easier than 900). So if Hartz gets their wish, we’d have to live with it for many, many years.

I’d be interested to see if any leeching of any materials from the adjacent site (a former GM ball bearing plant that is now Hyatt Hills) is in ground samples of the Hartz site, and there may be contamination from Hartz’s activities from back in the day.

So, in my opinion, pretty much the citizen’s best shot at stopping this is to make it so the numbers could not work for Hartz. Demand that they build a school or expand the current schools. Demand widened roads and traffic signals that are timed to improve traffic flow and pedestrian safety up and down Walnut (maybe even at Lincoln, maybe even up to North), perhaps even purchasing additional property to accommodate the widening. Demand traffic management by Walnut Avenue School with a parking turnout for people’s safety. Insist they test the living heck out of the soil. They need obstacles. Bad press is not enough.

That would be tough to do…Renting 905 units is going to be pretty stinking profitable. Lets say they have a 10% vacancy rate and rent them out at an average of $2,000 per month (that includes the cheap COAH units). Assuming 815 units are rented, that’s $1.6 million in revenue per month. Or almost $20 million a year. We’ll have to come up with a LOT of obstacles.

But, if the expenses to get it built and rented impact the numbers so badly it hurts the potential profitability for the next 10 years, they will look at another use.

But that means we as residents have to permit another use. Hartz owns the property and is entitled to do something with it. If we are against every last thing we’re just NIMBY idiots that show that Cranford is hostile to all business, and that is not a reputation you want to have.

So today I get a sponsored post  in Facebook from the Cranford Democrats…nothing wrong with that.

Clark-Commons

But I thought it really odd that they would use their sponsored ad to tout their (and specifically Kevin Campbell’s)concern over traffic and stormwater runoff. Uh, little late for that.

If they were concerned, why didn’t they raise the concerns at the 2012 and 2013 Clark planning meetings before the project was approved?

The stormwater runoff, unless if affects the drainage on Raritan or Walnut, will be downstream of us, and with the Rahway widening a lot within Clark, will the increased impervious surface be significant enough to be a factor?

I’ll be interested in seeing how much worse the Raritan and Central intersection will be. The widening could help, and if done right it could provide better flow for the left turn signals. It will probably take us a little longer to get to ShopRite, but this also will cut a few trips to Linden, Watchung and Union to do shopping.

I will admit, I was a little disappointed to see all of the big evergreens bordering on Walnut go down. I was surprised that none would/could be saved. It’d be a plus if they plant more trees than your average shopping center, which they may since they also have that cesspool ornamental pond and a gazebo…

The tenants (with some restaurants I didn’t expect):

  • Whole Foods (which will include its own restaurant and pub)
  • Home Goods
  • L.A. Fitness
  • Panera Bread
  • Panda Express
  • Chipotle
  • Applebee’s
  • Noodles & Company
  • Smashburger
  • Blaze Pizza
  • Red Mango
  • Dress Barn
  • Carter’s
  • Oshkosh
  • Petco
  • Michael’s
  • Five Below
  • Modell’s Sporting Goods
  • Party City
  • Sleepy’s
  • Visionworks
  • Ulta
  • Torrid
  • Hallmark
  • Vitamin Shoppe
  • Verizon Wireless
  • PNC Bank

The way they’re slapping this thing up I would bet it is open before August.

http://www.nj.com/union/index.ssf/2015/02/see_the_27_stores_leased_for_clark_commons_shoppin.html

 

The silver lining of the jobless stagflation is that most people (excepting the ones that will never get it or the ones that have this as their desired outcome) are getting a better idea on how the private and government sector interact and how bad government policy and Keynesian economics impact our country.

http://www.cnbc.com/id/44187274

Too bad they didn’t have Mr. Crane’s economics class, we could have saved about $12 trillion. (By the way, rest in peace, Mr. Crane.)

Or out of our property tax bills.

Seriously, did you really expect the town to keep the sewer bill in with the property taxes when they have the hard spending cap? Did you?

Well, the entire Cranford Democrat platform of 2010 is now moot: http://www.nj.com/cranford/index.ssf/2011/05/cranfords_separate_sewer_bill.html

And the whole process has been one of the silliest things I’ve seen in a while.

First I thought it was interesting that T-Mobile would be running ads that poke fun at the company that will be buying them.

But the line in the ad: “It makes sense if you don’t think about it” struck me.

It really did. I think some ad guy struck upon would should be the political phrase of the decade. It sums it all up as succintly as possible.

Make huge public pension guarantees? Tax the wealthy until they leave? Complain about the lack of growth while the government descends of small business like locusts?

“It makes sense if you don’t think about it.”

It’s perfect.

Next Page »