Uncategorized


Not to whomp on whom I am sure are quite earnest college kids, but oh, man this is a howler.

http://www.nj.com/opinion/index.ssf/2017/05/what_causes_inequality_among_similar_towns_in_nj_o.html

First, I will admit that “income inequality” to me is a tell that whomever is speaking doesn’t understand microeconomics or any economics for that matter.

So the question is posed, why is Plainfield so different from Westfield now with their marked inequality? Their suggested reason:

Consider the towns of Plainfield and Westfield in Union County, where income inequality is abundantly clear. Westfield households earn 2.69 times more and the average property is worth $429,100 more than their neighbors inPlainfield. Until the Central Railroad of New Jersey built a direct line between Westfield and Jersey City in 1901, Westfield and Plainfield shared a similar history.

Both towns were largely dependent on agriculture for growth and sustenance. But once the connection from Jersey City to Manhattan was established, Westfield transitioned from a blue-collar to white-collar town and naturally experienced economic prosperity. On the other hand, Plainfield did not gain access to the Jersey City line until 1910 – for  reasons which are still unclear.

Today, Westfield has an express line to/from Newark Penn station during rush hour that skips the seven other towns between Westfield and Manhattan. This has attracted more wealthy families to the area, led to a better school system and public services, and, overall, perpetuated the vast inequality between the neighboring towns.

Got that? Having rail service to Jersey City NINE YEARS longer than Plainfield is what made Westfield what it is today.

Wow.

I was tempted to say that if you tried to statistically model why the two towns are different, the discrepancy is rail service would have almost zero predictive value. But the explanation can be much simpler.

This is like saying that one restaurant is better than another because of napkin fabric selection in the 1980s.

There are hundreds of factors that would make two towns near each other diverge economically. Things like:

  • Local industries located in town (in the early part of the 20th century manufacturing was king)
  • World War II labor and housing for wartime workers / post WWII suburban development
  • Highway access (Westfield had better access to the GSP since it was built in the early 50s, 78 wasn’t completed until the late 70s.)
  • Land use and development (zoning or lack thereof)
  • Housing stock (homes for manufacturing employees vs professionals)
  • Crime and Policing effectiveness
  • Taxation policy
  • Political leadership and corruption (potentially the biggest factor)

But, no. Nine years of no railroad service equals economic doom.

Yes, I know, these are college kids and you may think I am being mean. I’m not. And to be fair, they do try to give themselves an out that their analysis is not very thorough.

In no way should one assume that rail access is the only factor which has created and continues to create such wide differences in town income levels. However, it should be clear, through historical context, that rail access (or lack thereof) played a role in the economic development of several New Jersey towns.

If that is true, then why are so many towns with fabulous rail access built early on (Linden and Rahway come to mind) aren’t as nice as Westfield? Is the difference that Westfield is “nicer” than Cranford because we don’t have an express train that skips Roselle Park and Union?

Um, no.

But, if they ever read this it’s for their own good, because they segue into something completely laughable.

As it turns out, the New Jersey state government itself tacitly acknowledges this fact with their relatively new Transit Village Initiative, which has had issuesgetting off the ground.

The Initiative offers funding to municipalities lacking access to NJ Transit’s train lines so that they can build new train stations and stimulate economic development in their towns. However, much of the burden to plan and create the infrastructure for new train stations (and subsequent development) falls on the towns themselves.

Yep. Transit Village cash from the state can be a key to solving income inequality!

Sigh.

Yes, a town can try to change its trajectory, and some have. But it takes decent political leadership and a will to out-compete other towns in the area to attract businesses and more upscale residents. Will a nicer train station help? I don’t think it helps as much as they think. Two blocks away from the Fanwood station, which is a cute little station, you don’t really know it’s there.  But then, Cranford’s is hideous, and it hasn’t dragged the town down with it.

But, you may argue, isn’t Cranford Crossing better than the vacant lot that was there? And wasn’t that a beneficiary of the Transit Village initiative? Yes, better than a vacant lot, but could it have been approved and built without any assistance from Transit Village funds? My understanding was that the 4 story parking garage was the major change from what would have been done if done completely privately. You’re welcome to set me straight in the comments.

Bottom line, Transit Village money is a token from the state that may make a few structures around the train station more aesthetically pleasing, but will have little effect on a town’s status and trajectory.  A town’s trajectory is much more dependent on the political leadership and focus on quality of life issues in the town as a whole.

Solving income inequality by removing government barriers to development such as lowering taxes and reducing corruption would be more effective than any Transit Village initiative, and more effective than any wealth redistribution.  A wealth redistribution would be successful at making Westfield more like Plainfield, but not Plainfield more like Westfield. But the latter two methods are “easy” for politicians and can enable them to enrich themselves and their friends, so they are the two methods more likely to be tried.

Maybe we should ask the kids to do some research on effects of poor tax policy and corruption in creating income inequality. Then they’d learn something.

Sigh.

Unfortunately, NJTransit plays a role in our family’s life that is greater than we’d like. And we have plenty of war stories on how many times it made us late, left us behind, left us stranded, or gave us a miserable commute.

So, this morning I read a breakdown of candidate “plans” on how to “fix” NJTransit.

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/every_candidate_for_nj_governor_has_a_plan_to_fix_1.html#incart_2box_nj-homepage-featured

And I am now certain of how I feel about the candidates.

I don’t like any of them.

NJTransit has been a mess for decades, and I get that to fix it would be a herculean effort.

http://www.nj.com/politics/index.ssf/2017/05/every_candidate_for_nj_governor_has_a_plan_to_fix_1.html#incart_2box_nj-homepage-featured

What would be the fastest way to clean it up? People will rain hate on my when I say privatization and modification of union contracts, but that is what it would take.

And anyone running for governor in NJ could never say that and have a prayer. Plus the constituencies that all line up for the fleecing of the state and commuters are very entrenched. It would be hard to do.

So the candidates are all picking easier things to do.

An Audit? Easy. Consequences are hard and would be limited.

More Federal Dollars? Easy. Papers over the problems and more people who should not get rich will get rich.

Raise taxes? Easy. But doesn’t fix anything.

Cross Honoring? They do that now.

My takeaway? Whomever gets in, nothing will happen. And we will be retired and long gone before anything gets better, or remote working arrangements finally nullify the need to commute. I see the latter as more likely than fixing NJTransit.

 

I’m wracking my brain as far as what movies I have seen in the theater this past year. I came up with Zootopia. I didn’t even see the December Star Wars other-quel. Finger on the pulse…that’s me.

So the Oscars would be a waste even more than hearing how half the country are just awful, awful, people. I wouldn’t know (or remotely care) about the films, even though some may have some redeeming qualities.

I reorganized a bunch of stuff in my basement instead, which I found much more satisfying. Plus it will result in fewer “what is the deal with that stuff by the workbench” queries I get regularly.

I noticed this weekend that the bulbs are starting to grow. The daffodils and the crocuses are pushing their way through. Will we get another dumping of snow or are we done? I think done.

Bridgegate was a scandal that I never really got interested in. For me it was sort of petty college prank level stuff. My reaction was more “really, this is what they’re going with?? as opposed to a reaction of “He. Must. Resign. Today.”

The Star Ledger beat the drum daily for years and that was tiresome and I would scroll past the articles. I did a lot of scrolling. Actually most articles on NJ.com are worth scrolling past. But that’s another post.

So the Governor’s office had a press release noting the fact that the matter is over. http://nj.gov/governor/news/news/552017/approved/20170127c.html

Did it derail his career and Presidential aspirations? I think they were pretty much done without it. The man can talk. I’ll give him that. He can think on his feet when confronted. But as far as getting things done and governing? I think he missed so many opportunities that we will be bearing the brunt of it for years. NJ is sliding downward. Just drive around if you don’t believe me. Not crashing, but sliding downward. He didn’t do much to arrest that.

If he had more traction in the polls he would have gotten more scrutiny on his record. The things he touted as “fixed” are in fact not fixed at all. The property tax “fix” is  nonsense. Towns just discovered that they can peel off services and bill for them separately.

He really didn’t get very much done.

What I think would have really killed his candidacy even if he survived the scrutiny was his plan to “save” Social Security by introducing means testing. So once again, if you worked and saved and were able to squirrel away enough to retire, the government would look at what you had and determine that the 15% or so percent that they withheld from you and your employer would no longer be yours anymore, and be handed to some impulsive and irresponsible person who didn’t save.

Which, as far as government behavior goes, is pretty typical.

But that is a crappy solution to the problem. A partial privatization would have fixed it without pain. A transfer of a portion of funds to an individual account where you could determine the allocation (so you had a shot to get it to get some return on investment) could have worked better. But to turn around and tell a large segment of the population they’ll get nothing and like it? Whomever his pollster was that said it would fly should have been escorted out immediately.

With his eviction off the Trump transition team, it’s not clear what’s next for him. At least I would think he won’t lose billions of dollars of his customers money trying to bolster a hare-brained investing scheme, like some people we know.

 

 

 

 

Was going to post something about the Halloween Parade but in doing yard work on the almost too-warm Sunday, I didn’t make it in time. Oh, well.

So thankfully, mercifully, finally we are done with the political season in a week. I can’t wait.

I have spent some time in the past couple days reading some of the emails on the wikileaks site. Not necessarily the ones highlighted in the media but skipping around and reading a random one here and there and in bulk. And I’ve learned a few things.

  1. John Podesta is not technologically savvy and will take the bus.
  2. They knew the private server was a wrong thing to do (it was) and everybody was using gmail instead of expected domain servers.
  3. They worried about things that I was surprised that they found important (emails discussing hours-long meetings on arcane or what I’d consider trivial topics).
  4. They really have pals in the media.
  5. Being corrupt is harder work than I thought.

Please, before I am savaged for partisan bias, note that I am not endorsing anybody or promoting anybody. And I live in New Jersey where my vote doesn’t really matter.I just thought that I’d take a look at some of the raw data dump as it is an opportunity to peek behind the curtain. https://wikileaks.com/podesta-emails/

That said, in aggregate our votes do matter, especially for Cranford Board of Ed and for the Town Council. As well as the referenda.

So go vote on November 8th!

 

It has been an eternity since I posted. We are some of the few remaining here in town for the holiday, as it feels like 70% have started their annual exodus to LBI.

I am hoping to take some pictures of the Memorial Day parade provided I don’t oversleep.

Update: Memorial Day Parade was cancelled. Too bad, the rain let up in time.

Regardless, please take a few minutes to remember those who gave all for our freedom.

We’re all being asked to be nuisances to our elected representatives so they can waste some of the government’s money on us for flood control instead of some other pork project somewhere else that will be only to the benefit of the people skimming money.

So, hey, why not? http://cranford.com/fund-the-flood-control-project-regarding-the-rahway-river/

Tip: Don’t begin your letter with something like:

“Dear Impossibly Corrupt and Unethical Thieves:”

It probably won’t be considered very persuasive.

Speaking of corruption, I am continuing my Oscar boycott for yet another year. I do admit that I did read a couple of the “brutally honest” Oscar ballots in the Hollywood Reporter. I thought it amusing that all of the voters profiled hated “The Revenant”. I don’t care for Leo DiCaprio..I don’t know about you, but when he’s onscreen, I can’t help but stare at his eyebrows. They’re like a bad toupee.

Next Page »